Back to comparisons

SKNK Field Notes · Point by point

Direct RIPE NCC Membership and Sponsoring LIR Relationships

The account, fees, policy contact, and day-to-day administration define the ownership model of a registry relationship.

Reviewed against public documentation: 2 August 2026

Compare point by point

Every point is concrete work.

Registry relationship administration

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

Your organisation manages the direct account and its obligations.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

The sponsoring LIR manages the relationship under the agreement.

Request process

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

Your organisation prepares and submits the request and account process.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

The End User provides the information while the sponsor runs the process under the agreement.

Network operations

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

BGP, upstream choices, filtering, and day-to-day operations sit with your organisation.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

The sponsor's service boundary covers the registry relationship; routing operations have their own operational owner.

Costs and terms

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

RIPE NCC's current fee schedule and direct-relationship obligations set the commercial framework.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

The sponsor's current price, service scope, and agreement set the commercial framework.

Relationship changes

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

The direct account and resource procedures govern changes in the relationship.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

Each resource has its own lifecycle, portability, and possible renumbering work.

Where this model fits

The actual network determines the fit.

Direct membership suits organisations that can run the complete registry relationship and its ongoing administration.

Sponsorship suits organisations that need an LIR to administer the relationship within a clearly stated boundary.

Confirmation items before an application or change

These three facts shape the next steps.

1

The named End User or resource holder

2

The governing policy and signed agreement

3

The lifecycle of each resource at service end

This guide organises the decision points; formal pages and agreements provide the binding details.

Policies, resource relationships, service boundaries, and upstream filters vary by situation. Formal pages and the responsible party confirm price, eligibility, ownership, and service-end arrangements.

SKNK · Sources and scope

Sources and scope for this comparison

Each source supports one kind of conclusion. Source pages, registry records, and routing observations update at different times, so read every result with its source and timestamp.

RIPE Database

Registry and IRR records

Primary object documentation

Useful for checking

Whether a public object exists for this ASN or prefix, who it is registered to, and who maintains it.

Needs a separate check

Live BGP observations show the current announcement state.

SKNK resource lifecycle

Current service terms

Read resource lifecycle

Useful for checking

What SKNK publicly states about its service and resource lifecycle.

Needs a separate check

The signed agreement and RIPE NCC policy remain the governing documents.