Back to comparisons

SKNK Field Notes · Point by point

Direct RIPE NCC Membership or a Sponsoring LIR?

The real difference is who owns the registry relationship: the account, the fees, the policy contact, and the day-to-day administration.

Reviewed against public documentation: 2 August 2026

Compare point by point

Every point is concrete work.

Who runs the registry relationship?

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

You manage the direct account and its obligations.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

The sponsoring LIR manages the relationship under the agreement.

How does the request move forward?

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

You prepare and submit the request and account process yourself.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

You provide the information; the sponsor runs the process — and you confirm every step.

Who operates the network?

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

BGP, upstream choices, filtering, and day-to-day network operations remain yours.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

The sponsor's service boundary ends at the registry relationship; routing operations sit outside it.

Costs and terms

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

Read RIPE NCC's current fee schedule and the obligations of a direct relationship.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

Read the sponsor's current price, what is in and out of scope, and the agreement.

If the relationship changes

Option one · Direct RIPE NCC membership / LIR relationship

Follow the account and resource procedures for your direct relationship.

Option two · Sponsoring LIR relationship

Check each resource's lifecycle, portability, and any renumbering work.

Where this can be a useful starting point

Put the choice back into your actual network.

Explore a direct relationship when you want to run the full registry relationship yourself and can carry the ongoing administration.

Explore sponsorship when you want a sponsoring LIR to administer the relationship inside a clearly stated boundary.

Before an application or change

Settle these questions first.

1

Who is named as the End User or resource holder on paper?

2

Which policy and signed agreement govern this relationship?

3

What happens to each resource if sponsorship or service ends?

This guide frames the questions; the answers come from the formal pages.

Policies, resource relationships, service boundaries, and upstream filters differ by situation. For price, eligibility, ownership, or service-end questions, use the formal pages and confirm with the responsible party.

SKNK · Sources and scope

Sources and scope for this comparison

Each source supports one kind of conclusion. Source pages, registry records, and routing observations update at different times, so read every result with its source and timestamp.

RIPE Database

Registry and IRR records

Primary object documentation

Useful for checking

Whether a public object exists for this ASN or prefix, who it is registered to, and who maintains it.

Not enough to prove alone

It cannot tell you whether the route is being announced. An object is not an announcement.

SKNK resource lifecycle

Current service terms

Read resource lifecycle

Useful for checking

What SKNK publicly states about its service and resource lifecycle.

Not enough to prove alone

It does not replace the signed agreement or RIPE NCC policy.