Back to comparisons

SKNK Field Notes · Point by point

IPv6 PA and PI: Lifecycle and Responsibilities

PA and PI differ in prefix administration, route-origin authority, and the work triggered by a provider change. Those lifecycle facts shape the choice alongside price.

Reviewed against public documentation: 2 August 2026

Compare point by point

Every point is concrete work.

Prefix administration

Option one · IPv6 PA

The provider, LIR, or allocation relationship administers the prefix.

Option two · IPv6 PI

The registry relationship and duties attach to the independent resource.

Announcement conditions

Option one · IPv6 PA

The upstream and the resource relationship both need to permit the announcement.

Option two · IPv6 PI

An upstream needs to accept the prefix and the intended BGP policy.

Provider changes

Option one · IPv6 PA

The end of the relationship can require renumbering.

Option two · IPv6 PI

Transfer, registry, and contract procedures govern a provider move.

ROA and IRR maintenance

Option one · IPv6 PA

The relevant ROA and route objects have a defined creation and change authority.

Option two · IPv6 PI

The resource holder's authority and the applicable registry workflow govern maintenance.

Where this model fits

The actual network determines the fit.

PA fits a plan that accepts the provider relationship and its service-end outcome.

PI brings eligibility, registry duties, upstream acceptance, and continuing upkeep into the resource plan.

Confirmation items before an application or change

These three facts shape the next steps.

1

Application materials and review timeline

2

One-off and recurring fee structure

3

Written process for changing a sponsor or upstream

This guide organises the decision points; formal pages and agreements provide the binding details.

Policies, resource relationships, service boundaries, and upstream filters vary by situation. Formal pages and the responsible party confirm price, eligibility, ownership, and service-end arrangements.

SKNK · Sources and scope

Sources and scope for this comparison

Each source supports one kind of conclusion. Source pages, registry records, and routing observations update at different times, so read every result with its source and timestamp.

RIPE Database

Registry and IRR records

Primary object documentation

Useful for checking

Whether a public object exists for this ASN or prefix, who it is registered to, and who maintains it.

Needs a separate check

Live BGP observations show the current announcement state.

RPKI / ROA

Route-origin authorisation

RIPE NCC RPKI documentation

Useful for checking

Whether the announcer holds an authorisation — prefix, origin ASN, and maximum length matching.

Needs a separate check

Propagation, service availability, and application approval each use separate evidence.

SKNK resource lifecycle

Current service terms

Read resource lifecycle

Useful for checking

What SKNK publicly states about its PA resource model.

Needs a separate check

Other resource and policy paths have their own eligibility and availability conditions.